![furry gay porn pop diaper furry gay porn pop diaper](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/H1kP8e_vYRo/maxresdefault.jpg)
They're obnoxious and detrimental in my opinion. I think being ashamed of babyfurs/diaperfurs, furries and the LGBT community is a problem for me. These negatives DO make it harder on other persons in the community to want to associate with it or be themselves. I'd be stupid to say I'm not a diaperfur and I don't enjoy the community, but there are aspects and entities of the community I do not support or want to associate with and would quite honestly, would love to see less of in the community! Am I saying people that fit under that category should be removed from the community? No. Does that mean that I should support gang violence, drug use, abuse or any of said negatives just because they exist and are part of the black community? Of course I support the black community and the positives of what it stands for but not it's negatives.įor me, it's much the same with babyfur/diaperfurs. This can be said for a number of other communities as well, not just babyfurs/diaperfurs. Me personally, I find it unbelievably hard at times to be supportive of the babyfur/diaperfur community simply because bottom line, things happen that should not be supported or that I just can't get behind or associate with. This debate is as old as time, and as I've said previously, occurs ALL THE TIME in the LGBTQ community, and even within the furry community (regarding the sfw/nsfw content).īe wholly supportive of your communities, whatever they may be. Your article sends mixed messages by telling us to be open but to not be open. Please, PLEASE don't disassociate yourselves from an aspect of a community you're ashamed of or disagree with, because when you do, you continually empower people that aren't a part of the community, and give them power over you, your perception of yourself, and your sexual identity. Likewise, If you love the babyfur and diaperfur communities, love it as a whole. If you love the LGBTQ community, love it as a whole. The gay people disassociating themselves from these "fringe elements" only wind up hurting their own cause, empowering the homophobes that denounce their behavior. They certainly exist, and they are gay, and they are part of the community. That the femme-party-gay fringe is an inaccurate representation of the gay-community. This debate has occurred in the LGBTQ community as well. But I am not ashamed of this aspect of my sexuality. If you believe that this sort of behavior is inappropriate, that is FINE. No diaperfur or babyfur gets to disassociate themselves from us just because of the nature of our paraphilia. These people, and myself included, are a part of the community. I happily admit to thoughts of public play (As if you haven't seen my drawings), and even admit to engaging in public play a few times, but generally with willing participants, and never in a manner noticeable to those around me. "I should love myself but not too much? I'm disgusting for having thoughts of public-play? I'm not a part of the community because you're ashamed of me?" But instead of flat-out saying so, the post instead sends it's reader a mixed message. And I TOTALLY agree that engaging others that would likely not consent to the paraphilia is wrong. I believe what the article post was likely trying to attack was the issue of engaging non-participants in a paraphilia in a non-consentual manner. Admittedly, some are overzealous to be certain, but publicly denouncing their behavior or policing their behavior, regardless of whether or not you agree with it, is wrong. These "fringe element" people clearly love themselves and participating in their paraphilia, and being a part of the babyfur/diaperfur community in general. And this is true, and it's a positive theme I wholeheartedly agree with.īut before we even reach this part of the article, we've already read about "fringe members" of the paraphilia who are to be denounced as an inaccurate portrayal of all babyfurs. The article asked babyfurs to be proud of who they are, to love themselves and to engage in their sexual identity, because it is unhealthy to avoid these aspects of ourselves. My criticism is aimed at the article/post accompanying this survey, and not so much this survey itself. I do have some feedback and criticisms for the post/article, however. I actually believe that tallying up the amount of babyfurs/diaperfurs is a splendid idea, and there are some positive themes within the article, such as loving yourself and your sexual identity/or just identity if the paraphilia isn't explicitly sexual for you. This is largely in response to an article "How to be a babyfur" and the survey accompanying it.